How Pressure Groups Activate Voters and Move Candidates Closer to the Median*

نویسنده

  • Donald Wittman
چکیده

This article shows how uninformed but rational voters can respond intelligently to political advertising. The article models a situation where a candidate must rely on a pressure group for financing political advertising and making endorsements. The pressure group uses its power over the purse to influence the position chosen by the candidate. Nevertheless, when uninformed voters use a strategic rule of thumb, pressure-group contributions always move the outcome of the election closer to the median voter. By using such a rule of thumb, when there is advertising, uninformed voters can have the same influence on the election as informed voters.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Unified Model of Spatial Voting∗

Experimental research shows that while most voters have some form of spatial preferences, individuals differ in the type of spatial preferences they have: many voters prefer candidates closer to themselves in a policy space (proximity voting), others prefer candidates that are simply on the same side of an issue as themselves (directional voting), and still others prefer those who will move pol...

متن کامل

Advocacy and Political Convergence under Preference Uncertainty

We study the formation of advocacy groups and how they can impact policy outcomes by revealing information about voters’ preferences to uninformed political candidates. We conduct a laboratory experiment based on a two-candidate spatial electoral competition setting where the policy preferences of voters are (initially) unknown and change over time. In the control treatment candidates learn abo...

متن کامل

Partisan Politics and Aggregation Failure with Ignorant Voters†

We analyze how voter ignorance effects competing candidates’ policy choices and election outcomes. We show that voter ignorance of policy positions has no effect in large elections provided voters know the preference distribution in the electorate. We then explore a model where voters are ignorant of policy positions and of the preference distribution. In that case limit equilibria (as the numb...

متن کامل

Information, Disinformation and Lobbying in a Median Voter Model

Candidates run for (a one-shot) election, adopting a platform of a single-dimensional policy variable p ∈[0,1]. Voters with heterogeneous single-peaked preferences over policies know candidates’ announced platforms, but perceive that the actual policy which would be implemented should that candidate be elected is a random variable (with mean equal to the announced platform) whose distribution i...

متن کامل

Party platforms in electoral competition with heterogeneous constituencies

This paper shows how political parties differentiate to reduce electoral competition. Two parties choose platforms in a unidimensional policy space, and then candidates from these parties compete for votes in a continuum of constituencies with different median voters. Departing from their parties’ platforms is costly enough that candidates do not take the median voter’s preferred position in ev...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009